Send without building the campaign by hand
Your supplier grids go out to the right population, with the deadline, in the recipient’s language.
A company answers the questionnaires it receives, sends its own to suppliers, and does both under rules that keep changing. The hub covers the first act; the ecosystem covers the other two, and the documentation that makes all of it possible. Each product is sold on its own.
The sovereign AI, specialised by function and by sector, that answers your tenders, security questionnaires, DDQs, ESG forms and audits from your own documents.
No answer library to build first. The documents stay where they are; the index lives inside your instance.
Source, page, version, a score from 0 to 100, a named approver, a timestamp. An answer without evidence is not an answer.
The file goes back in the format it arrived in, online portals included.
Any team answering questionnaires that commit the company's signature: pre-sales, compliance, security, legal.
You have just seen what a received questionnaire costs. Your suppliers experience exactly that when you send yours, and you live the other half of the problem: chasing, reading, comparing, deciding.
Your supplier grids go out to the right population, with the deadline, in the recipient’s language.
Chasing is the real cost of a third-party assessment programme. It is automated and logged, and the response rate becomes a metric rather than a meeting topic.
Incoming answers are analysed like your own: source, consistency, score. An unevidenced supplier claim is flagged as such, before you accept it.
Procurement, security and compliance teams assessing a supplier estate, who know that half the answers they receive are assertions.
This is the fourth difference block from the hub, described here in full: regulatory expertise that is not maintained becomes wrong within eighteen months, and an answer resting on a superseded text is an audit finding.
Applicable texts are tracked country by country, including where you have only a ten-person subsidiary.
A new version of a standard, a national transposition, a sector obligation: the assessment criteria are adjusted and the affected answers in your repository are flagged for review.
Which regime applies where, and what that changes about the answer to give. Useful as soon as a questionnaire spans several countries.
Compliance, legal and ESG teams in multi-country organisations, and anyone who has learned about a legal change from a client.
The whole picture
What the law requires of you, country by country, up to date.
The grids you send to your suppliers and partners.
What your clients, buyers and auditors ask you to prove.
Frequently asked
Yes, each is sold on its own. You can use Optivalue Platform for years without Reach or Watch, or buy Watch alone.
No. The platform is self-sufficient: it works on the documents you already have, in SharePoint, on a drive or elsewhere, whatever tool produced them.
The platform handles the questionnaires you receive; Reach handles the ones you send, from campaign to assessment of the replies. Same evidence engine, two directions.
Regulatory monitoring across 193 jurisdictions: when a text changes, the associated assessment grids are updated and the affected locations flagged. It is tooled monitoring tied to your answers, not legal advice.
Answering, or getting your suppliers to answer. Bring a real case: we run it in front of you, on your documents.